optimize_route_via_tunnel
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
optimize_route_via_tunnel [2018/11/16 20:43] admin created |
optimize_route_via_tunnel [2018/11/16 20:58] admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == Facts == | ||
| === Transit === | === Transit === | ||
| In Bolivia and in particular, transit offer to use their own AS via their own IPv4 block (even worse for IPv6) is near impossible. | In Bolivia and in particular, transit offer to use their own AS via their own IPv4 block (even worse for IPv6) is near impossible. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
| To lower cost, most of small ISP reuse the network access to anunciate their AS out of Bolivia via tunnel/VPN. | To lower cost, most of small ISP reuse the network access to anunciate their AS out of Bolivia via tunnel/VPN. | ||
| The IXP is not well developped into Bolivia, mean part of communicate is done out of Bolivia. | The IXP is not well developped into Bolivia, mean part of communicate is done out of Bolivia. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| == Solution == | == Solution == | ||
| - | Each small AS can connect via tunnel/VPN via common ISP. *This don't need any autorisation of any ISP*, you gain time, cost and it's very less complex. | + | Each small AS can connect via tunnel/VPN via common ISP. **This don't need any autorisation of any ISP**, you gain time, cost and it's very less complex. |
| Each big AS can use IXP, each IXP should connected via most common ISP. | Each big AS can use IXP, each IXP should connected via most common ISP. | ||
| === Result === | === Result === | ||
optimize_route_via_tunnel.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/11/16 20:58 by admin
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
